6.6 Kyoto Protocol; Convention on Biological Diversity & Montreal Protocol
Kyoto
Protocol
- It is an international treaty
- Negotiated under UNFCC
- Adopted in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan
- Came into force in 2005
- Parties : 192 (Canada withdrew)
- It gave binding targets to Annex I countries
- The Kyoto Protocol implemented the objective of the UNFCCC to
fight global warming by reducing greenhouse gas concentrations
- The Protocol is based on the principle of common but
differentiated responsibilities: it puts the obligation to reduce current
emissions on developed countries on the basis that they are historically
responsible for the current levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
- The Protocol’s first commitment period started in 2008 and
ended in 2012
- By 2008-2012, Annex 1 countries have to reduce their GHG
emissions by an average of5% below their 1990 levels (for many
countries, such as the EU member states, this corresponds to some 15%
below their expected GHG emissions in 2008).
- A second commitment period was agreed on in 2012, known as the Doha
Amendmentto the protocol.
- The amendment includes new commitments for parties to the
Protocol who agreed to take on commitments in a second commitment period
and a revised list of GHGs to be reported on by Parties.
- India has ratified the second
commitment period of Kyoto Protocol.
- Paris agreement (2015) is not an amendment to Kyoto Protocol
but a separate instrument altogether.
- Target under this protocol applies to following GHGs:
·
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
·
Methane (CH4)
·
Nitrous Oxide (NO2)
·
Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6)
·
Two groups of gases :
·
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
·
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
- Kyoto Protocol includes “flexible mechanisms” which allow
Annex 1 economies to meet their GHG targets by purchasing GHG emission
reductions from elsewhere. These can be bought either from :
·
financial exchanges (International Emissions Trading Scheme)
or
·
from projects which reduce emissions in non-Annex 1 economies
under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM),
·
or in other Annex-1 countries under the Joint
Implementation (JI)
- Only CDM Executive Board-accredited Certified Emission
Reductions (CER) can be bought and sold in this manner.
Convention on Biological Diversity
- Also
known as Biodiversity Convention
- It
is a multilateral treaty
- Opened
for signature on 5 June 1992 in Rio De Janeiro
- Entered
into force in 1993
- Signatories :
168
- Parties :
196
- It
is legally binding
- Convention has 3 main goals :
1.
Conservation of biological diversity
2.
Sustainable use of its components; and
3.
Fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic
resources
- India
plays an active part in this treaty. India is a party to convention
- USA
has signed but not ratified.
- Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety :
Also known as biosafety protocol
·
Adopted in 2000; Came into force in 2003
·
The Biosafety Protocol seeks to protect biological diversity
from the potential risks posed by living modified organisms resulting from
modern biotechnology.
·
Genetically Modified Organisms can be regulated under this
protocol
- Nagoya Protocol:
·
Adopted in Conference of Parties 10 (CoP10) (2010)
·
It deals with access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and
Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention
on Biological Diversity
·
It is a supplementary agreement to the Convention on
Biological Diversity.
·
The Strategic Plan consists of 20 new biodiversity targets for
2020, termed the ‘Aichi Biodiversity Targets’
Montreal Protocol
What is Montreal Protocol?
It seeks to cut the production and consumption
of ozone depleting substances (ODS) in order to protect the earth’s fragile
ozone layer. It also aims at phase out HCFCs by 2030. It came into force in
1989 and has been ratified by 197 parties making it universally ratified
protocol in UN history. It is also highly successful international arrangement,
as it has phased-out more than 95% of the ODS so far as per its main mandate in
less than 30 years of its existence.
What is happening under this?
Under the Montreal Protocol, the accelerated
phase out of Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) is underway with a aim to
complete phase out by 2030 of these chemicals that result in ozone depletion
and aid global warming. At present, HCFCs are used in various sectors like
refrigeration and air conditioning (RAC), polyurethane foam manufacturing and
cold chains sectors etc. These sectors are directly related to urban
development, agriculture through cold chain, and industrial development.
India is undertaking phase-out of HCFCs
through the implementation of HPMP. The Stage-I of HPMP has been already
implemented in the country and has successfully met all the ODS phase-out
targets, including those of HPMP Stage-I.
India has recently launched HPMP Stage-II for
2017-20123.
In a reversal of its earlier stand, recently
India accepted the request of the United States and some other developed
countries to work towards phasing out refrigeration chemicals known as
hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs, under the Montreal protocol on ozone layer
protection. Write a critical note on the importance of Montreal Protocol and
examine how would India’s policy
change affect industries and consumers in
India. (200 Words)
The Montreal Protocol (MP) aims at phasing out
ozone depleting substances such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and
hydro-chlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) that were mostly used in air conditioning,
refrigerating and foam industry. However, HFCs are not ozone depleting, but
have a high global warming potential.
Developed countries led by the US have been lobbying for the inclusion of HFCs within the MP. But this was opposed by developing countries led by India. The latter wanted HFCs to be governed by the Kyoto Protocol, which embodies the principle of “common but differentiated responsibility” (CBDR) unlike the MP which holds developed and developing countries equally responsible for elimination of banned chemicals.
However, India has recently reversed her stand
and agreed bring HFCs within MP. This would have the following implications:
1.
Given the absence of CBDR principle from the framework of MP,
India will be subject to a targeted and time-bound action on phasing out of
HFCs.
2.
India’s refrigeration sector is likely to be adversely impacted as
HFCs were its mainstay. They will now have to find an alternative (expensive)
technology that too within a short time. Increase in the cost of production
will directly increase prices for consumers.
3.
The next generation refrigerants are costly and patent protected
by developed countries. Thus cost of this technology transition for India can
be expensive.
In order to reduce their undesirable impacts,
India has to make a case for full compensation for India and other developing
countries for the cost of technology
transition and a longer time frame for this
transition
What India has decided?
India has decided to eliminate use of HFC-23,
a greenhouse gas (GHG) that harms the ozone layer by 2030.
Points to remember:
- Indian companies will not be compensated for the costs
involved in ensuring that these gases are not released.
- This move is considered as a major break away from the
concept of financial assistance for every action on environment in which
India earlier had shown the lead
What is Kigali Amendment?
- It amends the 1987 Montreal Protocol
- It aims to phase out Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), a family of
potent greenhouse gases by the late 2040s
- Under Kigali Amendment, in all 197 countries, including India
have agreed to a timeline to reduce the use of HFCs by roughly 85% of
their baselines by 2045.
What is significance of the Kigali Amendment?
- The Kigali Amendment amends the 1987 Montreal Protocol that
was designed to close growing ozone hole in by banning ozone-depleting
coolants like chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).
- Thus, amended Montreal Protocol which was initially conceived
only to plug gases that were destroying the ozone layer now includes HFCs
responsible for global warming.
- This move will help to prevent a potential 0.5 degree Celsius
rise in global temperature by the end of the century.
- The Kigali Agreement or amended Montreal Protocol for HFCs
reduction will be binding on countries from 2019.
- It also has provisions for penalties for
non-compliance.
- Under it, developed countries will also provide enhanced
funding support estimated at billions of dollars globally.
The exact amount of additional funding from developed countries will be
agreed at the next Meeting of the Parties in Montreal in 2017.
Different timelines under Kigali Amendment
- All signatory countries have been divided into three groups
with different timelines to go about reductions of HFCs.
- First group: It includes richest
countries like US and those in European Union (EU). They will freeze
production and consumption of HFCs by 2018. They will reduce them to about
15% of 2012 levels by 2036.
- Second group: It includes
countries like China, Brazil and all of Africa etc. They will freeze HFC
use by 2024 and cut it to 20% of 2021 levels by 2045.
- Third group: It includes
countries India, Pakistan, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia etc. They will be
freezing HFC use by 2028 and reducing it to about 15% of 2025 levels by 2047.
How it is different from Paris agreement?
The Paris agreement which will come into force
by 2020 is not legally binding on countries to cut their
emissions. The Kigali Amendment is considered absolutely vital for reaching the
Paris Agreement target of keeping global temperature rise to below 2-degree
Celsius compared to pre-industrial times.
NOTE: HFCs (Hydrofluorocarbons) are not Ozone
Depleting Substances but still they are included in Montreal Protocol via
Kigali Agreement because they are potent global warming substances.
Comments
Post a Comment